Tuesday, May 26, 2020
ââ¬ÅFellowships Untoldââ¬Â The Role of Wilfred Owenââ¬â¢s Poetry in Understanding Comradeship During World War I - Literature Essay Samples
In his recent study of the relationship between poetry and warfare, The Poetry of War, James Anderson Winn writes of the war poetââ¬â¢s ability to ââ¬Å"convey, often in the same line or stanza, both the intensity of love between men of arms and the powers of forces that constrain the expression of that love; cultural taboos, personal embarrassment and the looming presence of deathâ⬠. This analysis certainly holds true for the poetry of Wilfred Owen, a soldier whose writing details the uniquely harrowing experiences of front-line troops living and dying together in intense physical proximity. Accordingly, poems such as ââ¬Å"Spring Offensiveâ⬠, ââ¬Å"Apologia pro Poemate Meoâ⬠, and ââ¬Å"Strange Meetingâ⬠use stark realism and powerfully emotive imagery to explore the male bonds forged during combat. His depiction of male intimacy in the trenches has led some scholars to explore whether Owenââ¬â¢s work simply reflects an extension of late-Victorian valu es of honour and nobility, or whether the portrayal of comradeship and fellowship in his writing points towards something more subversive and unique. Therefore, it is also useful to consider Owenââ¬â¢s own sexuality when studying the way in which his writing combines front-line homoeroticism and depictions of the grisly realities of trench warfare. As direct witnesses to human loss and destruction on an unprecedented scale, the soldiers of World War One were united in an alienating knowledge of the senseless horrors of warfare. Indeed, much of Owenââ¬â¢s poetry addresses his comradesââ¬â¢ moral detachment from the rest of society, and, in particular, the older generation who encouraged young men to fight in the name of ââ¬Å"gloryâ⬠and ââ¬Å"honourâ⬠. In his 1917 poem, ââ¬Å"The Kind Ghostsâ⬠, Owen sneers at the self-satisfied ignorance of those back at home, suggesting that the young men on the front-line have been abandoned by an obtuse attitude of complacency. Adopting stark crimson imagery, the poem chastises the perceived attitude of indifference and neglect towards his fellow soldiers through the figure of a woman living in comfortable opulence, ââ¬Å"Not marvelling why her roses never fall/ Nor what red mouths were torn to make their bloomsâ⬠. A similar depiction of the psychological isolation felt by his fellow ââ¬Å"outsidersâ⬠can be identified in the final stanza of ââ¬Å"Spring Offensiveâ⬠, where Owen questions the stance of silence adopted by the survivors of a military battle:ââ¬Å"But what say such as from existenceââ¬â¢ brink Ventured but drave too swift to sink. The few who rushed in the body to enter hellâ⬠¦ Why speak they not of comrades that went under?â⬠[138-46]By speaking for those either unwilling or unable to speak for themselves, Owen demonstr ates the strong ties connecting men in battle, thus exuding a poignant sense of loyalty and duty towards the soldiers beside whom he fought. This display of allegiance and understanding recalls the words of fellow-poet Seigfried Sassoon, who expressed how the brutal conditions of warfare led to an unyielding affinity felt between men on the front-line: ââ¬Å"The man who really endured the war at its worst was everlastingly differentiated from everyone except his fellow soldiersâ⬠. As the voice of broken comrades, Owen feels the need to testify on their behalf and awaken the ââ¬Å"Nation at Homeâ⬠to the futile and destructive nature of the war. As such, Owenââ¬â¢s desperation to rejoin his comrades in battle following his treatment for shell-shock despite the knowledge that he will almost certainly die is a testament to the strength of the bonds formed during warfare. The affecting faithfulness displayed towards fallen troops consequently illustrates how Owen use s poetry as an expression of devotion to his comrades, and as a means of honouring fellow soldiers through written verse. In this way, it is possible to claim that the sense of fellowship and comradery evident in Owenââ¬â¢s poetry serves to humanise the unfamiliar, hostile brutality of war, infusing into the carnage typically ââ¬Å"Britishâ⬠values of loyalty, honour and community. This sense of moral elevation is strikingly demonstrated in ââ¬Å"Strange Meetingâ⬠, a surrealistic poem that depicts a confrontation between two dead soldiers ââ¬â the English narrator and a German enemy whom he ââ¬Å"jabbed and killedâ⬠in battle. Rather than engaging with the dominant discourse of hostility and fear of ââ¬Å"the otherâ⬠evident in much pro-war propaganda, Owen details the striking similarities between the two men (ââ¬Å"Whatever hope is yours,/ Was my life alsoâ⬠), and acknowledges the grim reality of ââ¬Å"the truth untoldâ⬠, a phrase la den with betrayal and regret at the pity of war. The poem replaces the destructiveness and brutality of battle with an act of reconciliation, culminating in the two soldiers joining each other in an eternal comradeship: ââ¬Å"Let us sleep nowâ⬠¦Ã¢â¬ . It is significant that Owen adapts a line of ââ¬Å"Strange Meetingâ⬠from Wordsworthââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"Ode: Intimations of Immortalityâ⬠(ââ¬Å"Even with truths that lie too deep for taintâ⬠), as both lines are implicit of a highly symbolic process of restoration and moral rebirth. Thus, through the act of comradery in Owenââ¬â¢s poetry it is possible to identify a certain wholesomeness and unity in the face of vast human destruction. The dignified solidarity between the two soldiers also recalls the poignant symbolism of the 1914 ââ¬Å"Christmas truceâ⬠, which saw several British and German troops temporarily cease hostilities to exchange gifts and play football in no manââ¬â¢s land during the festiv e period. Consequently, one can interpret Owenââ¬â¢s touching portrayal of male comradeship as a form of redemption and moral sustenance, thereby reflecting the contemporary Christian principles of honour, nobility and dedication . However, some have cited the themes addressed in Owenââ¬â¢s war poetry as an example of how male comradeship failed to function as the dominant culture intended. Rather than serving as a testament to British values, for example, his accounts of the hellish realities of warfare may imply a damaging relationship between male friendship in the trenches and psychological distress. Indeed, when tracking Owenââ¬â¢s writing during the course of his lifetime, it is evident that a stark contrast exists between the pre-war Christian traditionalist and the embittered, questioning individual of 1917. The literary critic Adrian Caesar has developed the issue of Owenââ¬â¢s growing disillusionment further by highlighting an unsettling sense of misogyny in a selection of his poems. For example, the violent condemnation of women in ââ¬Å"Le Christianismeâ⬠starkly illustrates his resentment of wives and mothers back at home and their apparent endorsement of warfare ââ¬â ââ¬Å"One Virgin still immaculate/ Smiles on for war to flatter her./ Sheââ¬â¢s haloââ¬â¢d with an old tin hat, / But a piece of hell will batter herâ⬠. In any case, it is evident that Owen values the love of fellow soldiers over the conventional, domesticated love shared between a husband and wife. In the poem, ââ¬Å"Apologia pro Poemate Meoâ⬠, he asserts the superiority of male intimacy and comradeship: ââ¬Å"For love is not the binding of fair lips With the soft silk of eyes that look and long, By Joy, whose ribbon slips, But wound with warââ¬â¢s hard wire whose stakes are strong; Bound with the bandage of the arm that drips; Knit in the welding of the rifle-throngâ⬠. [19-25]It is clear that Owenââ¬â¢s fellow comrades, as opposed to women, serve as his inspiration and are the driving force behind much of his poetry. A similar faith in the uncompromising love between soldiers is present in his famed poem, ââ¬Å"Disabledâ⬠, which details a young manââ¬â¢s isolation from society following a war injury which has left him ââ¬Å"leglessâ⬠and disfigured. Contrasting sharply with the ignorance and fickleness of the ââ¬Å"giddy jiltsâ⬠, who express revulsion and ââ¬Å"touch him like some queer diseaseâ⬠, only his fellow warriors can appreciate the manââ¬â¢s honour and sacrifice. In an affront to the chivalric rhetoric of the age, therefore, Owen is associating the male body with protest and vulnerability. This has led some readers of Owen to claim that the emotiona l bonds formed between men in the trenches served as a rejection of hegemonic ideals of the time, thus bringing to the fore a previously unexplored dimension to male intimacy during trench warfare. It is this apparent departure from late-Victorian principles of chivalry and masculinity that brings into question the significance of Owenââ¬â¢s homosexuality in understanding the themes of his work. Indeed, Niall Fergusonââ¬â¢s claim that a ââ¬Å"remarkably high proportionâ⬠of the British officer class were homosexuals ensures that the subject of front-line homoeroticism cannot be neglected in a discussion of male friendship and comradeship in the trenches. While, on the surface, the strong comradeship evident in his written verse could be construed as a conventional display of soldierly duty and solidarity, Owenââ¬â¢s deep love for his fellow comrades often borders on the erotic, a feature of his poetry that largely manifests itself through his apparent fixation with the male body. For example, in ââ¬Å"Futilityâ⬠, one of the few poems published during Owenââ¬â¢s lifetime, he uses the tragedy of a soldierââ¬â¢s death on the battlefield to reflect on the young manââ¬â¢s attractive vitality: ââ¬Å"Are limbs so dear achieved, are sides/ Full-nerved, still warm ââ¬â too hard to stir?â⬠Much of Owenââ¬â¢s war poetry expresses a homoerotic solidarity between soldiers at times of great stress and lingers on such details as ââ¬Å"the hands of boysâ⬠and ââ¬Å"their eyesâ⬠, thus merging images of horrific violence with something beautiful and untainted. Through the imagery adopted in his poems, Owen invites the reader to become a voyeur of sorts and share his respect of the vulnerable beauty of his fellow soldiers. It is this effective fusion of the representative and the erotic that sheds light on the intense attachment formed amongst soldiers in the trenches and thus demonstrates the complexities of male comradeship during the Great War. In conclusion, it is clear that powerful, distinctive bonds developed between soldiers during the intensely stressful and haunting experiences of trench warfare during World War One. The poetry of Wilfred Owen reflects this intimate sense of emotional fellowship by combining the harrowingly macabre with the beautifully erotic. Furthermore, Owen uses his poetry as a means of speaking on behalf of comrades whose voices have been silenced, either through death or through psychological trauma. Despite not necessarily functioning in the way that the dominant British culture demanded, the comradeship formed during the horror of trench warfare prompted the elevation and strengthening of male intimacy, with the love between soldiers serving as an impetus for a vast and affecting collection of wartime poetry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.